Sample report

This seeded national Bluetooth speaker illustrates all three assessment layers.

Check a product
Prepared for Northstar Audio Co.

Rechargeable Bluetooth Speaker

Portable consumer Bluetooth speaker with an embedded rechargeable lithium-ion battery, USB-C cable, and retail carton.

Generated
Sep 20, 2026
Product facts

What this readout is based on

Product identity

  • Rechargeable Bluetooth Speaker
  • No catalog identifiers on file.

Confirmed / user-provided

No confirmed catalog facts. Answers came from the questionnaire.

Inferred — review these

No inferred facts were used.

Unknown / missing

No unknown product facts flagged.

Program families evaluated
PackagingBatteriesElectronics
Your answers first
3programs in scope
0compliant components
0non-compliant components
State / program matrix

Assessment results

JurisdictionProgramStatusConfidence
VermontBatteries Why am I seeing this?In Scopehigh
Why am I seeing this?

Rechargeable battery within Vermont coverage (0.55 lbs, 45 Wh).

Rule: Electronic products with easily removable or packaged-with batteriesVersion: 2026-07-09-vermont-battery-v1Effective: 2026-01-01Library status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Product producer must participate unless the product is excluded by chapter 166 or every supplied battery is covered by a participating battery producer with written certification.
  • Supply retailers with educational materials describing collection opportunities.
What would improve confidence
  • Identify the obligated producer for Vermont: confirm brand-owner nationality, U.S. licensee, importer of record, or first-seller details.
Inspect 2 sources 10 V.S.A. § 7581 battery-containing productan electronic product that contains primary or rechargeable batteries that are easily removable or is packaged with10 V.S.A. § 7587 retailer obligationsshall provide the retailer with educational materials describing collection opportunities
Washington D.C.Batteries Why am I seeing this?In Scopehigh
Why am I seeing this?

Rechargeable battery within D.C. limits (0.55 lbs, 45 Wh; limit under 11 lbs and 300 Wh).

Rule: Covered battery-containing products, including embedded batteriesVersion: 2026-07-09-washington-dc-battery-v1Effective: 2023-03-10Library status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Product producer must join the BSO unless every supplied battery producer satisfies the approved-plan membership and written-certification exemption.
  • Maintain product- and battery-specific written certification where relying on the supplier exemption.
What would improve confidence
  • Identify the obligated producer for Washington D.C.: confirm brand-owner nationality, U.S. licensee, importer of record, or first-seller details.
Inspect 3 sources D.C. Code § 8-771.01‘Battery-containing product’ means a product that contains or is packaged with a rechargeable or primary battery.20 DCMR § 3901A producer ... shall ... Be a member of a BSOD.C. battery stewardship FAQYes, until the conditions specified in the law and regulations are met.
CaliforniaPackaging — Primary packaging Why am I seeing this?In Scopemedium
Why am I seeing this?

The described product is placed on the market with identified primary packaging in California; the cited producer-scope rule should be tested against the named supply-chain role.

Rule: California SB 54 producer registration and covered-material complianceVersion: 2026-07-09-california-packaging-epr-v1Effective: 2026-05-01Library status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Apply to participate in the approved PRO plan, apply for independent-producer compliance, or obtain an approved small-producer exemption. [CalRecycle producer guidance]
  • Register and submit covered-material supply data through CAA or CalRecycle's PEPRS route, as applicable. [CalRecycle producer guidance]
  • Provide baseline and annual reporting, source-reduction plans, and other compliance documents required through PEPRS or the PRO route. [CalRecycle PEPRS reporting]
  • Support statewide source-reduction, recyclability/compostability, and recycling-rate targets through the approved compliance route. [CalRecycle target schedule]
Inspect 5 sources CalRecycle producer guidanceproducers have until June 1, 2026, to do one of the followingCalRecycle SB 54 program pagecovered material includes single-use packaging and single-use plastic food service wareCalifornia SB 54 textadministrative civil penalty not to exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) per day per violationCalRecycle PEPRS reportingincluding baseline and annual reporting, source reduction plans, and other compliance documentationCalRecycle target schedule2032 ... 25% Less Single-Use Plastic ... 65% Single-Use Plastic Recycled ... 100% Recyclable or Compostable Packaging
ColoradoPackaging — Primary packaging Why am I seeing this?In Scopemedium
Why am I seeing this?

The described product is placed on the market with identified primary packaging in Colorado; the cited producer-scope rule should be tested against the named supply-chain role.

Rule: Colorado covered-material participation, reporting, and duesVersion: 2026-07-09-colorado-packaging-epr-v1Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Participate in the Producer Responsibility Program as a condition of selling or distributing products using covered materials in Colorado. [Colorado CDPHE program page]
  • Execute the applicable participation agreements/addendum and submit supply reports through the designated PRO process. [Colorado CDPHE reporting deadline]
  • Pay annual producer responsibility dues on covered materials. [Colorado CDPHE dues and records]
  • Keep records and report data sufficient to document compliance. [Colorado CDPHE dues and records]
Inspect 5 sources Colorado CDPHE program pagea producer cannot sell or distribute products that use covered materials ... unless they participate in the Producer Responsibility ProgramColorado General Assembly bill summaryThe program is funded by annual dues ... paid by producers of products that use covered materialsColorado HB 22-1355A PRODUCER IS EXEMPT ... IF THE PRODUCER IS ... A PERSON THAT HAS USED LESS THAN ONE TONColorado CDPHE reporting deadlinesigned the Participant Producer Agreement ... signed the Colorado State Addendum ... submitted a supply reportColorado CDPHE dues and recordspay the producer responsibility dues ... keep records and report data to document compliance
MarylandPackaging — Primary packaging Why am I seeing this?In Scopemedium
Why am I seeing this?

The described product is placed on the market with identified primary packaging in Maryland; the cited producer-scope rule should be tested against the named supply-chain role.

Rule: Maryland covered-material producer registration and responsibility plansVersion: 2026-07-09-maryland-packaging-epr-v1Effective: 2026-05-25Library status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Register covered-material brands and material categories through the approved PRO, or register with MDE if pursuing an individual producer responsibility plan. [Maryland MDE compliance guide]
  • Pay applicable registration/oversight fees and either join/provide information to the PRO or obtain an MDE-approved individual plan. [Maryland COMAR participation choices]
  • Report data necessary for the PRO or individual-plan route; MDE may approve prorated national data where Maryland-specific data is unavailable or infeasible. [Maryland MDE reporting guidance]
  • Maintain compliance records for at least five years and make exemption support available to MDE/PRO on request. [Maryland MDE records guidance]
Inspect 8 sources Maryland MDE compliance guideIf a producer distributes covered materials into Maryland, they must register by July 1, 2026.Maryland COMAR 26.04.14All documents and records necessary to ensure compliance must be maintainedMaryland adopted-regulations pageCOMAR 26.04.14.01 - .12 ... Effective Date ... 05/25/2026Maryland SB 901 pagesubmit ... a covered materials producer responsibility plan ... on or before July 1, 2028Maryland COMAR participation choicesPay fees ... Join ... a PRO; ... Have an IPP approved by the DepartmentMaryland MDE reporting guidancemay use prorated national data upon approval from the DepartmentMaryland MDE records guidanceAll books and records necessary to ensure compliance must be maintained for a minimum period of 5 yearsMaryland MDE sales-ban guidancea producer may not sell, offer for sale, distribute, or import ... unless they have an approved responsibility plan
MinnesotaPackaging — Primary packaging Why am I seeing this?In Scopemedium
Why am I seeing this?

The described product is placed on the market with identified primary packaging in Minnesota; the cited producer-scope rule should be tested against the named supply-chain role.

Rule: Minnesota packaging and paper producer membership and future stewardship-plan complianceVersion: 2026-07-09-minnesota-packaging-epr-v1Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Be a member of Minnesota's registered producer responsibility organization. [Minnesota statutes §115A.1448]
  • Enter a written agreement with a PRO to operate under the approved stewardship plan before the 2029 condition-of-sale date. [Minnesota written-agreement requirement]
  • Pay producer fees collected by the PRO once the approved plan and fee schedule apply; fees vary with quantity, program costs, and environmental/design attributes. [Minnesota statutes §115A.1454]
  • Provide information reasonably requested by MPCA to determine compliance. [Minnesota statutes §115A.1460]
Inspect 8 sources Minnesota statutes §115A.1448After July 1, 2025, a producer must be a member of a producer responsibility organizationMinnesota written-agreement requirementunless the producer enters into a written agreement with a producer responsibility organizationMinnesota statutes §§115A.1440, 115A.1441Covered material means packaging and paper products introduced. Covered material does not include exempt materials.Minnesota statutes §115A.1447submit a stewardship plan to the commissioner by October 1, 2028Minnesota statutes §115A.1454A producer responsibility organization must annually collect a fee from each member producerMinnesota statutes §115A.1460a person must furnish to the commissioner any information that the person hasMinnesota statutes §115A.1462liable for a civil penalty not to exceed $25,000 per day of violationMinnesota MPCA rulemaking pageThe PWCRA rule will aim to clarify definitions, exemptions, collection lists, statewide requirements
OregonPackaging — Primary packaging Why am I seeing this?In Scopemedium
Why am I seeing this?

The described product is placed on the market with identified primary packaging in Oregon; the cited producer-scope rule should be tested against the named supply-chain role.

Rule: Oregon covered-product PRO membership, fees, and recordsVersion: 2026-07-09-oregon-packaging-epr-v1Effective: 2022-01-01Library status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Register with and remain a member of a state-approved producer responsibility organization. [Oregon DEQ producer obligations]
  • Pay annual PRO membership fees based on covered-product quantity/type, environmental considerations, and program cost impacts. [Oregon DEQ fees and records]
  • Provide records or information requested by the PRO for program compliance. [Oregon DEQ fees and records]
  • For remote sales, the shipper responsible for delivery packaging must provide the notices described by DEQ to the product producer and relevant PRO. [Oregon DEQ remote-sale notice]
Inspect 5 sources Oregon DEQ producer obligationsBy July 1, 2025, individual producers must: Register with and be a member of a producer responsibility organizationOregon DEQ program pageApproved PRO Plan for 2025-27 submitted by Circular Action Alliance and amended May 4, 2026Oregon DEQ fees and recordsPay an annual membership fee to its PRO ... provide the PRO with records or other informationOregon DEQ remote-sale noticeThe shipper/seller must also notify the PRO to which the producer ... belongs.Oregon DEQ large-producer evaluationThe largest 25 producers are also required to perform and disclose evaluations
WashingtonPackaging — Primary packaging Why am I seeing this?In Scopemedium
Why am I seeing this?

The described product is placed on the market with identified primary packaging in Washington; the cited producer-scope rule should be tested against the named supply-chain role.

Rule: Washington residential packaging and paper producer PRO participationVersion: 2026-07-09-washington-packaging-epr-v1Effective: 2025-07-27Library status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Appoint a producer responsibility organization to address covered materials. [Washington RCW 70A.208.030]
  • Be a member of a registered PRO or register as a PRO implementing an individual plan. [Washington session law; Washington Ecology program page]
  • Through the PRO, fund end-of-life management and future statewide residential recycling services for covered materials. [Washington Ecology program page]
  • Pay PRO fees once assessed; approved-plan fees must vary with material quantity, program costs, and environmental/design attributes. [Washington RCW 70A.208.160]
Inspect 7 sources Washington Ecology program pageThe law requires producers of these products to join and fund a nonprofit Producer Responsibility OrganizationWashington RCW 70A.208.020Covered material means packaging and paper products introduced into the state.Washington RCW 70A.208.030By January 1, 2026, each producer must appoint a producer responsibility organizationWashington producer registration informationA list of all member producers ... and ... a list of all brandsWashington RCW 70A.208.060The department's approval of the first producer responsibility organization plans ... must take effect no earlier thanWashington RCW 70A.208.160must annually collect a fee from each member producerWashington session lawAfter July 1, 2026, be a member of a producer responsibility organization registered in this state
Out-of-scope programs (1) — out of scope based on your answers
IllinoisBatteries Why am I seeing this?Out of Scopehigh
Why am I seeing this?

Illinois routes an embedded, easily removable battery out of standalone battery stewardship.

Rule: Embedded non-removable batteries awaiting assessmentVersion: 2026-07-09-illinois-battery-v1Effective: 2024-08-09Library status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Do not apply current portable/medium-format stewardship participation solely because the product contains an embedded non-removable battery; assess electronics coverage separately.
Inspect 2 sources 415 ILCS 205/10not intended or designed to be easily removable from the battery-containing product415 ILCS 205/75By October 1, 2027, the Agency must submit the assessment ... to the General Assembly.
JurisdictionProgramStatusConfidence
IllinoisBatteries Why am I seeing this?Out of Scopehigh
Why am I seeing this?

Illinois routes an embedded, easily removable battery out of standalone battery stewardship.

Rule: Embedded non-removable batteries awaiting assessmentVersion: 2026-07-09-illinois-battery-v1Effective: 2024-08-09Library status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Do not apply current portable/medium-format stewardship participation solely because the product contains an embedded non-removable battery; assess electronics coverage separately.
Inspect 2 sources 415 ILCS 205/10not intended or designed to be easily removable from the battery-containing product415 ILCS 205/75By October 1, 2027, the Agency must submit the assessment ... to the General Assembly.
VermontBatteries Why am I seeing this?In Scopehigh
Why am I seeing this?

Rechargeable battery within Vermont coverage (0.55 lbs, 45 Wh).

Rule: Electronic products with easily removable or packaged-with batteriesVersion: 2026-07-09-vermont-battery-v1Effective: 2026-01-01Library status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Product producer must participate unless the product is excluded by chapter 166 or every supplied battery is covered by a participating battery producer with written certification.
  • Supply retailers with educational materials describing collection opportunities.
What would improve confidence
  • Identify the obligated producer for Vermont: confirm brand-owner nationality, U.S. licensee, importer of record, or first-seller details.
Inspect 2 sources 10 V.S.A. § 7581 battery-containing productan electronic product that contains primary or rechargeable batteries that are easily removable or is packaged with10 V.S.A. § 7587 retailer obligationsshall provide the retailer with educational materials describing collection opportunities
Washington D.C.Batteries Why am I seeing this?In Scopehigh
Why am I seeing this?

Rechargeable battery within D.C. limits (0.55 lbs, 45 Wh; limit under 11 lbs and 300 Wh).

Rule: Covered battery-containing products, including embedded batteriesVersion: 2026-07-09-washington-dc-battery-v1Effective: 2023-03-10Library status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Product producer must join the BSO unless every supplied battery producer satisfies the approved-plan membership and written-certification exemption.
  • Maintain product- and battery-specific written certification where relying on the supplier exemption.
What would improve confidence
  • Identify the obligated producer for Washington D.C.: confirm brand-owner nationality, U.S. licensee, importer of record, or first-seller details.
Inspect 3 sources D.C. Code § 8-771.01‘Battery-containing product’ means a product that contains or is packaged with a rechargeable or primary battery.20 DCMR § 3901A producer ... shall ... Be a member of a BSOD.C. battery stewardship FAQYes, until the conditions specified in the law and regulations are met.
CaliforniaElectronics Why am I seeing this?Needs Reviewlow
Why am I seeing this?

Electronics programs use product-specific covered-device definitions; the current description is not precise enough for California.

Rule: Covered battery-embedded product fee and manufacturer dutiesVersion: 2026-07-09-california-ced-v1Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Manufacturer annually identifies covered and exempt products by brand and model to California retailers and CalRecycle.
  • Covered products must carry manufacturer or brand identification and battery-chemistry information on-product or on the manufacturer's website.
  • Retailer charges the consumer the covered battery-embedded product recycling fee at purchase.
  • Manufacturer begins annual CalRecycle reports by July 1, 2027.
What would improve confidence
  • Device type, screen size if applicable, end user, and whether the product matches the state covered-device definition.
Inspect 4 sources CalRecycle SB 1215 Covered Battery-Embedded ProductsBy July 1, 2025, manufacturers of CBEPs must list covered products and exempt products in an annual noticeCalRecycle SB 1215 Covered Battery-Embedded ProductsBeginning on January 1, 2026, consumers will pay the recycling fee for CBEPs at the time of purchase.CalRecycle SB 1215 Covered Battery-Embedded Productscovered products must be labeled with the name or brand of the manufacturer and with information identifying the battery's chemistryCalRecycle Manufacturer InformationOn or before July 1, 2027, manufacturers of covered battery-embedded products must begin sending CalRecycle annual Manufacturer Reports
ConnecticutElectronics Why am I seeing this?Needs Reviewlow
Why am I seeing this?

Electronics programs use product-specific covered-device definitions; the current description is not precise enough for Connecticut.

Rule: Connecticut covered electronic device manufacturer finance obligationVersion: 2026-07-09-connecticut-ced-v1Effective: 2009-01-01Library status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Manufacturer permanently labels each covered device with its brand.
  • Manufacturer registers with DEEP annually and pays the annual registration fee.
  • Manufacturer finances transportation and recycling by participating in the state program and paying approved-recycler costs attributed to it.
  • A manufacturer operating a private program files its description with registration and reports prior-year collection weight by August 15.
What would improve confidence
  • Device type, screen size if applicable, end user, and whether the product matches the state covered-device definition.
Inspect 4 sources Connecticut DEEP — Requirements for Manufacturersclearly and permanently label their CEDs with the manufacturer's brandConnecticut DEEP — Requirements for Manufacturersregister with the DEEP annually; pay DEEP an annual registration feeConnecticut DEEP — Requirements for Manufacturersfinance the transportation and recycling of CEDs by participating in the state programConnecticut DEEP — Private Program Reportingsubmitted electronically each year by August 15th with the total weight of each CED by category
IllinoisElectronics Why am I seeing this?Needs Reviewlow
Why am I seeing this?

Electronics programs use product-specific covered-device definitions; the current description is not precise enough for Illinois.

Rule: Illinois CERA manufacturer registration and program planVersion: 2026-07-09-illinois-ced-v1Effective: 2019-01-01Library status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Manufacturer registers with Illinois EPA and pays the registration fee by April 1 each year before selling covered devices.
  • Manufacturer individually or through a clearinghouse funds and provides the annual residential collection, transportation, and recycling program.
  • Manufacturer or clearinghouse submits the annual program plan by July 1 and the transportation and recycling report by March 1 of the following year.
What would improve confidence
  • Device type, screen size if applicable, end user, and whether the product matches the state covered-device definition.
Inspect 6 sources Illinois EPA — ManufacturersRegister by April 1 of preceding year by submitting a registration form and feeIllinois EPA — ManufacturersProvide an annual e-waste program that transports and recycles residential CEDsIllinois EPA — Program Planssubmit a manufacturer e-waste program plan to Illinois EPA by July 1 of every program yearIllinois EPA — ManufacturersSubmit Manufacturer's Transportation & Recycling Report by March 1 of following yearIllinois EPA — ManufacturersEffective January 1, 2027 ... expands its scope to include peripherals and home audio componentsIllinois EPA — Manufacturer Registrationmanufacturers exclusively selling peripherals ... and no other CEDs are exempt from the registration requirements
MaineElectronics Why am I seeing this?Needs Reviewlow
Why am I seeing this?

Electronics programs use product-specific covered-device definitions; the current description is not precise enough for Maine.

Rule: Maine covered electronic device registration and recycling costVersion: 2026-07-09-maine-ced-v1Effective: 2006-01-18Library status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Manufacturer permanently labels each covered device with its identity.
  • Manufacturer registers before sale and re-registers with Maine DEP by April 1 annually, including national covered-product sales data and any applicable fee.
  • Manufacturer pays recycling costs associated with its products.
  • Retailers may sell only properly labeled devices whose manufacturer and brand are compliant and registered.
What would improve confidence
  • Device type, screen size if applicable, end user, and whether the product matches the state covered-device definition.
Inspect 4 sources Maine DEP — Compliance with Maine's E-Waste Lawaffix a permanent label to each device identifying the manufacturerMaine DEP — Compliance with Maine's E-Waste Lawregister annually and pay an annual registration feeMaine DEP — Compliance with Maine's E-Waste LawCompanies must re-register by April 1 each year thereafter.Maine DEP — Compliance with Maine's E-Waste LawA retailer may not sell covered electronic devices in or into Maine unless the manufacturer is in compliance
MinnesotaElectronics Why am I seeing this?Needs Reviewlow
Why am I seeing this?

Electronics programs use product-specific covered-device definitions; the current description is not precise enough for Minnesota.

Rule: Minnesota video display device manufacturer obligationsVersion: 2026-07-09-minnesota-ced-v1Effective: 2007-07-01Library status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Manufacturer registers with Minnesota each year and pays the registration fee when prior-year Minnesota household sales reach 100 VDDs.
  • Manufacturer supports collection and recycling of covered electronic devices from Minnesota households and reports how it met the obligation.
  • Manufacturer reports prior-calendar-year VDD market share by March 1 and program-year recycling results by August 15.
What would improve confidence
  • Device type, screen size if applicable, end user, and whether the product matches the state covered-device definition.
Inspect 6 sources Minnesota Pollution Control Agency — Electronics manufacturersregister with the state and, if they sell 100 or more VDDs in Minnesota, pay a registration feeMinnesota Pollution Control Agency — Electronics manufacturerssupport collection and recycling of covered electronic devices (CED) from households/consumers in MinnesotaMinnesota Pollution Control Agency — Electronics manufacturersManufacturers report on their market share of VDD in the previous calendar year by March 1Minnesota Pollution Control Agency — Electronics manufacturersBy August 15 each year, manufacturers must report on their required CED recyclingMinnesota Pollution Control Agency — Electronics manufacturersComplete and submit the registration form by August 15 each year, or within 10 days of offering VDDs for saleMinnesota Pollution Control Agency — Electronics manufacturersThe program's year runs from July 1 to June 30.
New JerseyElectronics Why am I seeing this?Needs Reviewlow
Why am I seeing this?

Electronics programs use product-specific covered-device definitions; the current description is not precise enough for New Jersey.

Rule: New Jersey manufacturer registration, collection plan, and reportingVersion: 2026-07-09-new-jersey-ced-v1Effective: 2011-01-01Library status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Manufacturer registers annually by January 1 and pays the $5,000 registration fee.
  • Manufacturer or group submits an annual collection plan, generally by June 1 for the following calendar year.
  • Manufacturer meets the assigned weight-based collection, transportation, and recycling obligation and reports semiannually.
What would improve confidence
  • Device type, screen size if applicable, end user, and whether the product matches the state covered-device definition.
Inspect 5 sources NJDEP — E-Cycle ManufacturersRegistration is required ... on or before January 1, annually.NJDEP — E-Cycle ManufacturersA registration fee of $5,000.00 must be submitted with this registration formNJDEP — E-Cycle ManufacturersElectronics Manufacturers ... are required to submit Collection Plans each year for the Department's review and approval.NJDEP — E-Cycle ManufacturersGenerally, Collection Plans are required to be submitted by June 1NJDEP — E-Cycle ManufacturersReporting is now required semiannually.
New YorkElectronics Why am I seeing this?Needs Reviewlow
Why am I seeing this?

Electronics programs use product-specific covered-device definitions; the current description is not precise enough for New York.

Rule: New York covered electronic equipment acceptance programVersion: 2026-07-09-new-york-ced-v1Effective: 2011-04-01Library status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Manufacturer completes certified registration before selling or offering covered electronic equipment in New York.
  • Manufacturer pays program costs and operates an individual or collective continuous electronic waste acceptance program, generally at no cost to consumers.
  • An individual-program manufacturer pays the $5,000 registration fee; the fee is waived for collective-program participation.
  • Manufacturer meets its annual acceptance standard and reporting requirements.
What would improve confidence
  • Device type, screen size if applicable, end user, and whether the product matches the state covered-device definition.
Inspect 4 sources NYSDEC — Covered Electronic Equipment Manufacturer Requirementssubmit a one-time online certified registration to the Department ... prior to selling or offering for sale CEENYSDEC — Covered Electronic Equipment Manufacturer RequirementsPayment of all costs associated with the implementation of its electronic waste acceptance programNYSDEC — Covered Electronic Equipment Manufacturer Requirementsmust maintain a continuous acceptance program and must not cease the acceptance of electronic wasteNYSDEC — Covered Electronic Equipment Manufacturer Requirementssells less than one thousand units of CEE annually in the state ... is not considered a manufacturer
OregonElectronics Why am I seeing this?Needs Reviewlow
Why am I seeing this?

Electronics programs use product-specific covered-device definitions; the current description is not precise enough for Oregon.

Rule: Oregon E-Cycles 2026 manufacturer participationVersion: 2026-07-09-oregon-ced-v1Effective: 2026-01-01Library status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Manufacturer registers and submits sales data annually to Oregon DEQ.
  • Manufacturer designates a producer responsibility organization and funds the program.
  • The designated PRO operates under a DEQ-reviewed program plan.
  • Retailers selling covered devices in or into Oregon must follow the E-Cycles sales requirements.
What would improve confidence
  • Device type, screen size if applicable, end user, and whether the product matches the state covered-device definition.
Inspect 6 sources Oregon DEQ E-Cycles 2026The new Oregon E-Cycles program will begin on Jan. 1, 2026.Oregon DEQ E-Cycles 2026Manufacturers must register and submit sales data annually with DEQ, must designate a PRO and must fund the program.Oregon DEQ E-Cycles 2026Producer responsibility organizations designated by manufacturers must submit a program plan to DEQ for review and approval.Oregon DEQ Manufacturer Fact SheetExemption for manufacturers that sell fewer than 50 covered electronic devices in a given year in Oregon.Oregon DEQ E-Cycles 2026Retailers that sell covered electronic devices in or into Oregon ... must follow certain requirementsOregon DEQ HB 3220 amendment summaryClarify that smartphones as excluded from 'covered electronic device'
PennsylvaniaElectronics Why am I seeing this?Needs Reviewlow
Why am I seeing this?

Electronics programs use product-specific covered-device definitions; the current description is not precise enough for Pennsylvania.

Rule: Pennsylvania covered-device manufacturer planVersion: 2026-07-09-pennsylvania-ced-v1Effective: 2012-01-01Library status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Manufacturer registers and pays the $5,000 fee by August 31 before each program year.
  • Manufacturer individually or in a group establishes, conducts, and manages a plan to collect, transport, and recycle covered-device weight equal to sales weight from two years earlier.
  • Manufacturer submits the recycling plan by August 31 and an annual report by January 31.
  • Manufacturer may not charge a consumer for covered-device collection, transportation, or recycling except under the stated equal-value incentive rule.
What would improve confidence
  • Device type, screen size if applicable, end user, and whether the product matches the state covered-device definition.
Inspect 5 sources Pennsylvania DEP — Electronics Recycling Stakeholder RequirementsRegistration and payment are due by August 31st prior to the beginning of each program year.Pennsylvania DEP — Electronics Recycling Stakeholder Requirementscollect, transport, and recycle a quantity of covered devices equal to its sales weight from two years priorPennsylvania DEP — Electronics Recycling Stakeholder Requirementsmust submit an annual report ... by Jan. 31 of each yearPennsylvania DEP — Electronics Recycling Stakeholder RequirementsManufacturers of only computer peripherals are excluded from the manufacturer requirementsPennsylvania DEP — Electronics Recycling Stakeholder RequirementsPayment is due to the department by March 15th following the program year.
WashingtonElectronics Why am I seeing this?Needs Reviewlow
Why am I seeing this?

Electronics programs use product-specific covered-device definitions; the current description is not precise enough for Washington.

Rule: E-Cycle Washington manufacturer registration and plan participationVersion: 2026-07-09-washington-ced-v1Effective: 2009-01-01Library status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Manufacturer registers annually with Ecology, pays the annual administrative fee, and participates in an approved recycling plan before selling in or into Washington.
  • Manufacturers finance the collection, transportation, recycling, and administration of E-Cycle Washington.
What would improve confidence
  • Device type, screen size if applicable, end user, and whether the product matches the state covered-device definition.
Inspect 3 sources Washington Ecology — Manufacturersregister annually with us, pay an annual administrative fee, and participate in a recycling planWashington Ecology — E-Cycle guidance and reportsA Washington State law passed in 2006 requires electronics manufacturers to pay for this recycling program.Washington Ecology — E-Cycle WashingtonComputer peripherals such as keyboards, mice, and printers are not included in the E-Cycle WA program.
Washington D.C.Electronics Why am I seeing this?Needs Reviewlow
Why am I seeing this?

Electronics programs use product-specific covered-device definitions; the current description is not precise enough for Washington D.C..

Rule: eCYCLE DC manufacturer registration and collection programVersion: 2026-07-09-washington-dc-ced-v1Effective: 2017-01-01Library status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Manufacturer labels new covered electronic equipment with a readily visible brand and registers with DOEE.
  • Registration includes the applicable fee, a collection and recycling or reuse plan, and a report on past activity.
  • Manufacturer certifies that recycling or reuse vendors have R2 or e-Stewards certification.
  • Manufacturer or its program meets its minimum collection share or representative-organization convenience requirement.
What would improve confidence
  • Device type, screen size if applicable, end user, and whether the product matches the state covered-device definition.
Inspect 4 sources DOEE — eCYCLE DC Manufacturerslabel its CEE with a readily visible brand identifying the manufacturer and ... register with DOEEDOEE — eCYCLE DC ManufacturersRegistration includes a payment of a fee, a collection and recycling or reuse plan, and a reportDOEE — eCYCLE DC ManufacturersManufacturers must certify that their vendors recycling or reusing CEE have e-Stewards or R2 certification.DOEE — eCYCLE DC ManufacturersDe minimis manufacturers do not need to complete a full registration form, pay a registration fee, or collect
CaliforniaPackaging — Primary packaging Why am I seeing this?In Scopemedium
Why am I seeing this?

The described product is placed on the market with identified primary packaging in California; the cited producer-scope rule should be tested against the named supply-chain role.

Rule: California SB 54 producer registration and covered-material complianceVersion: 2026-07-09-california-packaging-epr-v1Effective: 2026-05-01Library status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Apply to participate in the approved PRO plan, apply for independent-producer compliance, or obtain an approved small-producer exemption. [CalRecycle producer guidance]
  • Register and submit covered-material supply data through CAA or CalRecycle's PEPRS route, as applicable. [CalRecycle producer guidance]
  • Provide baseline and annual reporting, source-reduction plans, and other compliance documents required through PEPRS or the PRO route. [CalRecycle PEPRS reporting]
  • Support statewide source-reduction, recyclability/compostability, and recycling-rate targets through the approved compliance route. [CalRecycle target schedule]
Inspect 5 sources CalRecycle producer guidanceproducers have until June 1, 2026, to do one of the followingCalRecycle SB 54 program pagecovered material includes single-use packaging and single-use plastic food service wareCalifornia SB 54 textadministrative civil penalty not to exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) per day per violationCalRecycle PEPRS reportingincluding baseline and annual reporting, source reduction plans, and other compliance documentationCalRecycle target schedule2032 ... 25% Less Single-Use Plastic ... 65% Single-Use Plastic Recycled ... 100% Recyclable or Compostable Packaging
ColoradoPackaging — Primary packaging Why am I seeing this?In Scopemedium
Why am I seeing this?

The described product is placed on the market with identified primary packaging in Colorado; the cited producer-scope rule should be tested against the named supply-chain role.

Rule: Colorado covered-material participation, reporting, and duesVersion: 2026-07-09-colorado-packaging-epr-v1Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Participate in the Producer Responsibility Program as a condition of selling or distributing products using covered materials in Colorado. [Colorado CDPHE program page]
  • Execute the applicable participation agreements/addendum and submit supply reports through the designated PRO process. [Colorado CDPHE reporting deadline]
  • Pay annual producer responsibility dues on covered materials. [Colorado CDPHE dues and records]
  • Keep records and report data sufficient to document compliance. [Colorado CDPHE dues and records]
Inspect 5 sources Colorado CDPHE program pagea producer cannot sell or distribute products that use covered materials ... unless they participate in the Producer Responsibility ProgramColorado General Assembly bill summaryThe program is funded by annual dues ... paid by producers of products that use covered materialsColorado HB 22-1355A PRODUCER IS EXEMPT ... IF THE PRODUCER IS ... A PERSON THAT HAS USED LESS THAN ONE TONColorado CDPHE reporting deadlinesigned the Participant Producer Agreement ... signed the Colorado State Addendum ... submitted a supply reportColorado CDPHE dues and recordspay the producer responsibility dues ... keep records and report data to document compliance
MarylandPackaging — Primary packaging Why am I seeing this?In Scopemedium
Why am I seeing this?

The described product is placed on the market with identified primary packaging in Maryland; the cited producer-scope rule should be tested against the named supply-chain role.

Rule: Maryland covered-material producer registration and responsibility plansVersion: 2026-07-09-maryland-packaging-epr-v1Effective: 2026-05-25Library status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Register covered-material brands and material categories through the approved PRO, or register with MDE if pursuing an individual producer responsibility plan. [Maryland MDE compliance guide]
  • Pay applicable registration/oversight fees and either join/provide information to the PRO or obtain an MDE-approved individual plan. [Maryland COMAR participation choices]
  • Report data necessary for the PRO or individual-plan route; MDE may approve prorated national data where Maryland-specific data is unavailable or infeasible. [Maryland MDE reporting guidance]
  • Maintain compliance records for at least five years and make exemption support available to MDE/PRO on request. [Maryland MDE records guidance]
Inspect 8 sources Maryland MDE compliance guideIf a producer distributes covered materials into Maryland, they must register by July 1, 2026.Maryland COMAR 26.04.14All documents and records necessary to ensure compliance must be maintainedMaryland adopted-regulations pageCOMAR 26.04.14.01 - .12 ... Effective Date ... 05/25/2026Maryland SB 901 pagesubmit ... a covered materials producer responsibility plan ... on or before July 1, 2028Maryland COMAR participation choicesPay fees ... Join ... a PRO; ... Have an IPP approved by the DepartmentMaryland MDE reporting guidancemay use prorated national data upon approval from the DepartmentMaryland MDE records guidanceAll books and records necessary to ensure compliance must be maintained for a minimum period of 5 yearsMaryland MDE sales-ban guidancea producer may not sell, offer for sale, distribute, or import ... unless they have an approved responsibility plan
MinnesotaPackaging — Primary packaging Why am I seeing this?In Scopemedium
Why am I seeing this?

The described product is placed on the market with identified primary packaging in Minnesota; the cited producer-scope rule should be tested against the named supply-chain role.

Rule: Minnesota packaging and paper producer membership and future stewardship-plan complianceVersion: 2026-07-09-minnesota-packaging-epr-v1Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Be a member of Minnesota's registered producer responsibility organization. [Minnesota statutes §115A.1448]
  • Enter a written agreement with a PRO to operate under the approved stewardship plan before the 2029 condition-of-sale date. [Minnesota written-agreement requirement]
  • Pay producer fees collected by the PRO once the approved plan and fee schedule apply; fees vary with quantity, program costs, and environmental/design attributes. [Minnesota statutes §115A.1454]
  • Provide information reasonably requested by MPCA to determine compliance. [Minnesota statutes §115A.1460]
Inspect 8 sources Minnesota statutes §115A.1448After July 1, 2025, a producer must be a member of a producer responsibility organizationMinnesota written-agreement requirementunless the producer enters into a written agreement with a producer responsibility organizationMinnesota statutes §§115A.1440, 115A.1441Covered material means packaging and paper products introduced. Covered material does not include exempt materials.Minnesota statutes §115A.1447submit a stewardship plan to the commissioner by October 1, 2028Minnesota statutes §115A.1454A producer responsibility organization must annually collect a fee from each member producerMinnesota statutes §115A.1460a person must furnish to the commissioner any information that the person hasMinnesota statutes §115A.1462liable for a civil penalty not to exceed $25,000 per day of violationMinnesota MPCA rulemaking pageThe PWCRA rule will aim to clarify definitions, exemptions, collection lists, statewide requirements
OregonPackaging — Primary packaging Why am I seeing this?In Scopemedium
Why am I seeing this?

The described product is placed on the market with identified primary packaging in Oregon; the cited producer-scope rule should be tested against the named supply-chain role.

Rule: Oregon covered-product PRO membership, fees, and recordsVersion: 2026-07-09-oregon-packaging-epr-v1Effective: 2022-01-01Library status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Register with and remain a member of a state-approved producer responsibility organization. [Oregon DEQ producer obligations]
  • Pay annual PRO membership fees based on covered-product quantity/type, environmental considerations, and program cost impacts. [Oregon DEQ fees and records]
  • Provide records or information requested by the PRO for program compliance. [Oregon DEQ fees and records]
  • For remote sales, the shipper responsible for delivery packaging must provide the notices described by DEQ to the product producer and relevant PRO. [Oregon DEQ remote-sale notice]
Inspect 5 sources Oregon DEQ producer obligationsBy July 1, 2025, individual producers must: Register with and be a member of a producer responsibility organizationOregon DEQ program pageApproved PRO Plan for 2025-27 submitted by Circular Action Alliance and amended May 4, 2026Oregon DEQ fees and recordsPay an annual membership fee to its PRO ... provide the PRO with records or other informationOregon DEQ remote-sale noticeThe shipper/seller must also notify the PRO to which the producer ... belongs.Oregon DEQ large-producer evaluationThe largest 25 producers are also required to perform and disclose evaluations
WashingtonPackaging — Primary packaging Why am I seeing this?In Scopemedium
Why am I seeing this?

The described product is placed on the market with identified primary packaging in Washington; the cited producer-scope rule should be tested against the named supply-chain role.

Rule: Washington residential packaging and paper producer PRO participationVersion: 2026-07-09-washington-packaging-epr-v1Effective: 2025-07-27Library status: MVP — review recommended
What this rule may require
  • Appoint a producer responsibility organization to address covered materials. [Washington RCW 70A.208.030]
  • Be a member of a registered PRO or register as a PRO implementing an individual plan. [Washington session law; Washington Ecology program page]
  • Through the PRO, fund end-of-life management and future statewide residential recycling services for covered materials. [Washington Ecology program page]
  • Pay PRO fees once assessed; approved-plan fees must vary with material quantity, program costs, and environmental/design attributes. [Washington RCW 70A.208.160]
Inspect 7 sources Washington Ecology program pageThe law requires producers of these products to join and fund a nonprofit Producer Responsibility OrganizationWashington RCW 70A.208.020Covered material means packaging and paper products introduced into the state.Washington RCW 70A.208.030By January 1, 2026, each producer must appoint a producer responsibility organizationWashington producer registration informationA list of all member producers ... and ... a list of all brandsWashington RCW 70A.208.060The department's approval of the first producer responsibility organization plans ... must take effect no earlier thanWashington RCW 70A.208.160must annually collect a fee from each member producerWashington session lawAfter July 1, 2026, be a member of a producer responsibility organization registered in this state
AlabamaPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Alabama does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
AlabamaBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Alabama does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
AlabamaElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Alabama does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
AlaskaPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Alaska does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
AlaskaBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Alaska does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
AlaskaElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Alaska does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
ArizonaPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Arizona does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
ArizonaBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Arizona does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
ArizonaElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Arizona does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
ArkansasPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Arkansas does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
ArkansasBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Arkansas does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
ArkansasElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Arkansas does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
CaliforniaBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

California does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
ColoradoBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Colorado does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
ColoradoElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Colorado does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
ConnecticutPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Connecticut does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
ConnecticutBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Connecticut does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
DelawarePackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Delaware does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
DelawareBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Delaware does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
DelawareElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Delaware does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
FloridaPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Florida does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
FloridaBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Florida does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
FloridaElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Florida does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
GeorgiaPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Georgia does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
GeorgiaBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Georgia does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
GeorgiaElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Georgia does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
HawaiiPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Hawaii does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
HawaiiBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Hawaii does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
HawaiiElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Hawaii does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
IdahoPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Idaho does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
IdahoBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Idaho does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
IdahoElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Idaho does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
IllinoisPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Illinois does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
IndianaPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Indiana does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
IndianaBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Indiana does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
IndianaElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Indiana does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
IowaPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Iowa does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
IowaBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Iowa does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
IowaElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Iowa does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
KansasPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Kansas does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
KansasBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Kansas does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
KansasElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Kansas does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
KentuckyPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Kentucky does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
KentuckyBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Kentucky does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
KentuckyElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Kentucky does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
LouisianaPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Louisiana does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
LouisianaBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Louisiana does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
LouisianaElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Louisiana does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
MainePackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Maine does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
MaineBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Maine does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
MarylandBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Maryland does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
MarylandElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Maryland does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
MassachusettsPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Massachusetts does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
MassachusettsBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Massachusetts does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
MassachusettsElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Massachusetts does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
MichiganPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Michigan does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
MichiganBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Michigan does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
MichiganElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Michigan does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
MinnesotaBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Minnesota does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
MississippiPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Mississippi does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
MississippiBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Mississippi does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
MississippiElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Mississippi does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
MissouriPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Missouri does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
MissouriBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Missouri does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
MissouriElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Missouri does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
MontanaPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Montana does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
MontanaBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Montana does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
MontanaElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Montana does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
NebraskaPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Nebraska does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
NebraskaBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Nebraska does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
NebraskaElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Nebraska does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
NevadaPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Nevada does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
NevadaBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Nevada does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
NevadaElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Nevada does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
New HampshirePackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

New Hampshire does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
New HampshireBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

New Hampshire does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
New HampshireElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

New Hampshire does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
New JerseyPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

New Jersey does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
New JerseyBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

New Jersey does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
New MexicoPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

New Mexico does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
New MexicoBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

New Mexico does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
New MexicoElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

New Mexico does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
New YorkPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

New York does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
New YorkBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

New York does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
North CarolinaPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

North Carolina does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
North CarolinaBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

North Carolina does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
North CarolinaElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

North Carolina does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
North DakotaPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

North Dakota does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
North DakotaBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

North Dakota does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
North DakotaElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

North Dakota does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
OhioPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Ohio does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
OhioBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Ohio does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
OhioElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Ohio does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
OklahomaPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Oklahoma does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
OklahomaBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Oklahoma does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
OklahomaElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Oklahoma does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
OregonBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Oregon does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
PennsylvaniaPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Pennsylvania does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
PennsylvaniaBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Pennsylvania does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
Rhode IslandPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Rhode Island does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
Rhode IslandBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Rhode Island does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
Rhode IslandElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Rhode Island does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
South CarolinaPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

South Carolina does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
South CarolinaBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

South Carolina does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
South CarolinaElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

South Carolina does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
South DakotaPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

South Dakota does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
South DakotaBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

South Dakota does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
South DakotaElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

South Dakota does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
TennesseePackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Tennessee does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
TennesseeBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Tennessee does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
TennesseeElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Tennessee does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
TexasPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Texas does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
TexasBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Texas does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
TexasElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Texas does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
UtahPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Utah does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
UtahBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Utah does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
UtahElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Utah does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
VermontPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Vermont does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
VermontElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Vermont does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
VirginiaPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Virginia does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
VirginiaBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Virginia does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
VirginiaElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Virginia does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
WashingtonBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Washington does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
West VirginiaPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

West Virginia does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
West VirginiaBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

West Virginia does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
West VirginiaElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

West Virginia does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
WisconsinPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Wisconsin does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
WisconsinBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Wisconsin does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
WisconsinElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Wisconsin does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
WyomingPackaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Wyoming does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
WyomingBatteries Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Wyoming does not currently have an active Batteries EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
WyomingElectronics Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Wyoming does not currently have an active Electronics EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
Washington D.C.Packaging Why am I seeing this?Not Regulatedhigh
Why am I seeing this?

Washington D.C. does not currently have an active Packaging EPR program in place.

Rule: No active EPR program in jurisdictionVersion: coverage-status-2026-09Effective: unknownLibrary status: MVP — review recommended
Inspect 0 sources
Status guide
In ScopeIn Scope: The product is in scope for this EPR program in the state and does not qualify for exemptions.
Out of ScopeOut of Scope: The product is out of scope for this EPR program in the state.
Needs ReviewNeeds Review: More information is needed to confirm the product's status.
Not RegulatedNot Regulated: This state does not currently have an active EPR program for this product category.
Status across state EPR programs
In Scope
Needs Review
Out of Scope
Not Regulated
Obligated producer

Who is responsible for each component

Battery

3 jurisdictions
Producer could not be determinedResolved producer: Unknown · Confidence none · Risk high
View producer details by jurisdiction

Illinois

Undetermined
Producer
Unknown
You are the producer?
No
Stewardship
Compliance not resolved — review

Vermont

Undetermined
Producer
Unknown
You are the producer?
No
Stewardship
Compliance not resolved — review

Washington D.C.

Undetermined
Producer
Unknown
You are the producer?
No
Stewardship
Compliance not resolved — review

Electronics (CED)

11 jurisdictions

Interim assumption: every electronics jurisdiction defaults to the brand owner pending a full per-state producer-role waterfall. Confirm before relying on this for a specific state.

You are the obligated producerResolved producer: Northstar Audio Co. · Confidence medium · Risk medium
View producer details by jurisdiction

California

Brand owner
Producer
Northstar Audio Co.
You are the producer?
Yes
Stewardship
Compliance not resolved — review

Oregon

Brand owner
Producer
Northstar Audio Co.
You are the producer?
Yes
Stewardship
Compliance not resolved — review

Washington

Brand owner
Producer
Northstar Audio Co.
You are the producer?
Yes
Stewardship
Compliance not resolved — review

Minnesota

Brand owner
Producer
Northstar Audio Co.
You are the producer?
Yes
Stewardship
Compliance not resolved — review

New York

Brand owner
Producer
Northstar Audio Co.
You are the producer?
Yes
Stewardship
Compliance not resolved — review

Maine

Brand owner
Producer
Northstar Audio Co.
You are the producer?
Yes
Stewardship
Compliance not resolved — review

New Jersey

Brand owner
Producer
Northstar Audio Co.
You are the producer?
Yes
Stewardship
Compliance not resolved — review

Connecticut

Brand owner
Producer
Northstar Audio Co.
You are the producer?
Yes
Stewardship
Compliance not resolved — review

Illinois

Brand owner
Producer
Northstar Audio Co.
You are the producer?
Yes
Stewardship
Compliance not resolved — review

Pennsylvania

Brand owner
Producer
Northstar Audio Co.
You are the producer?
Yes
Stewardship
Compliance not resolved — review

Washington D.C.

Brand owner
Producer
Northstar Audio Co.
You are the producer?
Yes
Stewardship
Compliance not resolved — review

Primary packaging

6 jurisdictions
You are the obligated producerResolved producer: Varies by state — see breakdown below · Confidence medium · Risk medium
View producer details by jurisdiction

Colorado

Brand owner
Producer
Northstar Audio Co.
You are the producer?
Yes
Stewardship
Compliance not resolved — review

Oregon

Undetermined
Producer
Unknown
You are the producer?
No
Stewardship
Compliance not resolved — review

California

Brand owner
Producer
Northstar Audio Co.
You are the producer?
Yes
Stewardship
Compliance not resolved — review

Washington

Brand owner
Producer
Northstar Audio Co.
You are the producer?
Yes
Stewardship
Compliance not resolved — review

Maryland

Brand owner
Producer
Northstar Audio Co.
You are the producer?
Yes
Stewardship
Compliance not resolved — review

Minnesota

Brand owner
Producer
Northstar Audio Co.
You are the producer?
Yes
Stewardship
Compliance not resolved — review

Producer determinations are based on the identity facts provided and each program's statutory waterfall. Confirm role-specific edge cases (licensing, franchise, marketplace sales) with counsel before relying on this for registration.

Compliance status

Where each regulated component stands

For every regulated component, whether it falls in scope of the state program and whether the producer appears on that program's producer list.

Packaging

6 in scope · 51 evaluated

California

In ScopeCompliance Pending
Producer registration
Program Being Finalized

California has adopted a packaging program but producer registration is not yet open, so no producer list exists to check against.

Maryland

In ScopeCompliance Pending
Producer registration
Program Being Finalized

Maryland has adopted a packaging program but producer registration is not yet open, so no producer list exists to check against.

Minnesota

In ScopeCompliance Pending
Producer registration
Program Being Finalized

Minnesota has adopted a packaging program but producer registration is not yet open, so no producer list exists to check against.

Washington

In ScopeCompliance Pending
Producer registration
Program Being Finalized

Washington has adopted a packaging program but producer registration is not yet open, so no producer list exists to check against.

Colorado

In Scope
Producer registration
Producer list not checked

Oregon

In Scope
Producer registration
Producer list not checked
45 jurisdictions not in scope
  • Alabama Not Regulated
  • Alaska Not Regulated
  • Arizona Not Regulated
  • Arkansas Not Regulated
  • Connecticut Not Regulated
  • Delaware Not Regulated
  • Florida Not Regulated
  • Georgia Not Regulated
  • Hawaii Not Regulated
  • Idaho Not Regulated
  • Illinois Not Regulated
  • Indiana Not Regulated
  • Iowa Not Regulated
  • Kansas Not Regulated
  • Kentucky Not Regulated
  • Louisiana Not Regulated
  • Maine Not Regulated
  • Massachusetts Not Regulated
  • Michigan Not Regulated
  • Mississippi Not Regulated
  • Missouri Not Regulated
  • Montana Not Regulated
  • Nebraska Not Regulated
  • Nevada Not Regulated
  • New Hampshire Not Regulated
  • New Jersey Not Regulated
  • New Mexico Not Regulated
  • New York Not Regulated
  • North Carolina Not Regulated
  • North Dakota Not Regulated
  • Ohio Not Regulated
  • Oklahoma Not Regulated
  • Pennsylvania Not Regulated
  • Rhode Island Not Regulated
  • South Carolina Not Regulated
  • South Dakota Not Regulated
  • Tennessee Not Regulated
  • Texas Not Regulated
  • Utah Not Regulated
  • Vermont Not Regulated
  • Virginia Not Regulated
  • Washington D.C. Not Regulated
  • West Virginia Not Regulated
  • Wisconsin Not Regulated
  • Wyoming Not Regulated

Batteries

2 in scope · 51 evaluated

Vermont

In Scope
Producer registration
Producer list not checked

Washington D.C.

In Scope
Producer registration
Producer list not checked
49 jurisdictions not in scope
  • Alabama Not Regulated
  • Alaska Not Regulated
  • Arizona Not Regulated
  • Arkansas Not Regulated
  • California Not Regulated
  • Colorado Not Regulated
  • Connecticut Not Regulated
  • Delaware Not Regulated
  • Florida Not Regulated
  • Georgia Not Regulated
  • Hawaii Not Regulated
  • Idaho Not Regulated
  • Illinois Out of Scope
  • Indiana Not Regulated
  • Iowa Not Regulated
  • Kansas Not Regulated
  • Kentucky Not Regulated
  • Louisiana Not Regulated
  • Maine Not Regulated
  • Maryland Not Regulated
  • Massachusetts Not Regulated
  • Michigan Not Regulated
  • Minnesota Not Regulated
  • Mississippi Not Regulated
  • Missouri Not Regulated
  • Montana Not Regulated
  • Nebraska Not Regulated
  • Nevada Not Regulated
  • New Hampshire Not Regulated
  • New Jersey Not Regulated
  • New Mexico Not Regulated
  • New York Not Regulated
  • North Carolina Not Regulated
  • North Dakota Not Regulated
  • Ohio Not Regulated
  • Oklahoma Not Regulated
  • Oregon Not Regulated
  • Pennsylvania Not Regulated
  • Rhode Island Not Regulated
  • South Carolina Not Regulated
  • South Dakota Not Regulated
  • Tennessee Not Regulated
  • Texas Not Regulated
  • Utah Not Regulated
  • Virginia Not Regulated
  • Washington Not Regulated
  • West Virginia Not Regulated
  • Wisconsin Not Regulated
  • Wyoming Not Regulated

Electronics

11 in scope · 51 evaluated

California

Needs Review
Producer registration
No producer list for this state — obligations only

California publishes no electronics producer list, so no producer is listed as compliant or non-compliant. In-scope products still carry obligations.

Connecticut

Needs Review
Producer registration
Producer list not checked

Illinois

Needs Review
Producer registration
Producer list not checked

Maine

Needs Review
Producer registration
Producer list not checked

Minnesota

Needs Review
Producer registration
Producer list not checked

New Jersey

Needs Review
Producer registration
Producer list not checked

New York

Needs Review
Producer registration
Producer list not checked

Oregon

Needs Review
Producer registration
Producer list not checked

Pennsylvania

Needs Review
Producer registration
Producer list not checked

Washington

Needs Review
Producer registration
Producer list not checked

Washington D.C.

Needs Review
Producer registration
Producer list not checked
40 jurisdictions not in scope
  • Alabama Not Regulated
  • Alaska Not Regulated
  • Arizona Not Regulated
  • Arkansas Not Regulated
  • Colorado Not Regulated
  • Delaware Not Regulated
  • Florida Not Regulated
  • Georgia Not Regulated
  • Hawaii Not Regulated
  • Idaho Not Regulated
  • Indiana Not Regulated
  • Iowa Not Regulated
  • Kansas Not Regulated
  • Kentucky Not Regulated
  • Louisiana Not Regulated
  • Maryland Not Regulated
  • Massachusetts Not Regulated
  • Michigan Not Regulated
  • Mississippi Not Regulated
  • Missouri Not Regulated
  • Montana Not Regulated
  • Nebraska Not Regulated
  • Nevada Not Regulated
  • New Hampshire Not Regulated
  • New Mexico Not Regulated
  • North Carolina Not Regulated
  • North Dakota Not Regulated
  • Ohio Not Regulated
  • Oklahoma Not Regulated
  • Rhode Island Not Regulated
  • South Carolina Not Regulated
  • South Dakota Not Regulated
  • Tennessee Not Regulated
  • Texas Not Regulated
  • Utah Not Regulated
  • Vermont Not Regulated
  • Virginia Not Regulated
  • West Virginia Not Regulated
  • Wisconsin Not Regulated
  • Wyoming Not Regulated

Producer lists are published by each program or PRO and are evidence of listing only, not a certification of compliance. Listings change between publications — confirm status with the program before relying on it.

Operating plan

Turn the readout into action

Address data gaps

  • Identify the obligated producer for Vermont: confirm brand-owner nationality, U.S. licensee, importer of record, or first-seller details.
  • Identify the obligated producer for Washington D.C.: confirm brand-owner nationality, U.S. licensee, importer of record, or first-seller details.
  • Device type, screen size if applicable, end user, and whether the product matches the state covered-device definition.

Access product insights

  • Packaging component weights and material codes drive annual PRO fee tiers.
  • Battery chemistry, weight, and removability determine stewardship registration requirements.
  • State covered electronic device (CED) rules depend on screen size and device specifications.

Register and report

  • Confirm registration or stewardship-plan responsibility.
  • Resolve who the obligated battery producer is in Vermont before acting on stewardship obligations.
  • Resolve who the obligated battery producer is in Washington D.C. before acting on stewardship obligations.
  • Confirm producer designation and PRO registration path.
  • Prepare annual sales volume and packaging material reporting datasets.
Need help acting on this readout?

Get an additional review from one of our in-house EPR experts.